The everyday case for a baker's argument for fewer ingredients
The useful details behind a subject that is usually discussed in generalities.
The bigger picture
The best meals often use fewer ingredients than expected. Each addition has to justify the attention it takes.
A good way to understand a baker's argument for fewer ingredients is to ask what it replaced. The comparison reveals the real constraint, not just the advertised improvement.
“Repetition is the secret ingredient nobody lists.”
The practical view
Reducing food waste is mostly a scheduling problem. The food that spoils is usually the food that had no plan.
Scale changes the problem. A solution that works for ten people can fail at a hundred if the support structure never grows with it.
The open question
A sharp knife and a stable board improve cooking more than another appliance. Basic tools reward maintenance.
The open question is whether a baker's argument for fewer ingredients can remain useful once the novelty fades. That is a better test than the first enthusiastic review.
The point of looking closely at a baker's argument for fewer ingredients is not to arrive at a verdict. It is to notice the choices that were hiding in plain sight.